Best Known (49, 49+29, s)-Nets in Base 16
(49, 49+29, 579)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (49, 78, 579)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 20, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (29, 58, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 29, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 29, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (6, 20, 65)-net over F16, using
(49, 49+29, 1717)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (49, 78, 1717)-net over F16, using
(49, 49+29, 1690536)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (49, 78, 1690537)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (49, 77, 1690537)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 521 484656 452887 251070 690356 165107 091467 260316 001565 477291 577920 817096 610701 832313 420215 155696 > 1677 [i]