Best Known (50, 50+29, s)-Nets in Base 16
(50, 50+29, 579)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 79, 579)-net over F16, using
- 161 times duplication [i] based on digital (49, 78, 579)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 20, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (29, 58, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 29, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 29, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (6, 20, 65)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(50, 50+29, 1894)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (50, 79, 1894)-net over F16, using
(50, 50+29, 2060788)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 79, 2060789)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (50, 78, 2060789)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 8343 736708 369620 901653 690712 347967 603410 639832 989164 562515 408121 284617 714873 521353 318418 661816 > 1678 [i]