Best Known (63, 63+29, s)-Nets in Base 16
(63, 63+29, 1034)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (63, 92, 1034)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (16, 30, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 15, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 15, 258)-net over F256, using
- digital (33, 62, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 31, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 31, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (16, 30, 516)-net over F16, using
(63, 63+29, 6826)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (63, 92, 6826)-net over F16, using
(63, 63+29, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (63, 92, large)-net in base 16, because
- 27 times m-reduction [i] would yield (63, 65, large)-net in base 16, but