Best Known (65, 65+29, s)-Nets in Base 16
(65, 65+29, 1036)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 94, 1036)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (18, 32, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 16, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 16, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (33, 62, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 31, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 31, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (18, 32, 518)-net over F16, using
(65, 65+29, 8318)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (65, 94, 8318)-net over F16, using
(65, 65+29, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 94, large)-net in base 16, because
- 27 times m-reduction [i] would yield (65, 67, large)-net in base 16, but