Best Known (77, 77+29, s)-Nets in Base 16
(77, 77+29, 1544)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (77, 106, 1544)-net over F16, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 18, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 9, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 9, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (14, 28, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 14, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 14, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (31, 60, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 30, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 30, 258)-net over F256, using
- digital (9, 18, 514)-net over F16, using
(77, 77+29, 27264)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (77, 106, 27264)-net over F16, using
(77, 77+29, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (77, 106, large)-net in base 16, because
- 27 times m-reduction [i] would yield (77, 79, large)-net in base 16, but