Best Known (35, 35+30, s)-Nets in Base 16
(35, 35+30, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 65, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (35, 66, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 259)-net over F256, using
(35, 35+30, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (35, 65, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (35, 66, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 321)-net over F256, using
(35, 35+30, 70709)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 65, 70710)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 1 852758 434568 905040 672165 114536 034667 176275 079158 438717 162159 279113 258593 840376 > 1665 [i]