Best Known (65−31, 65, s)-Nets in Base 16
(65−31, 65, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 65, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (34, 66, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 33, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 33, 258)-net over F256, using
(65−31, 65, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (34, 65, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (34, 66, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 33, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 33, 289)-net over F256, using
(65−31, 65, 58775)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 65, 58776)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (34, 64, 58776)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 115812 720205 258939 345426 295699 217667 577590 930510 459603 445338 141555 418660 230726 > 1664 [i]