Best Known (88−31, 88, s)-Nets in Base 16
(88−31, 88, 583)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (57, 88, 583)-net over F16, using
- 161 times duplication [i] based on digital (56, 87, 583)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 21, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (35, 66, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (6, 21, 65)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(88−31, 88, 596)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(57, 88, 596)-net in base 16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- (9, 24, 80)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 16, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 16, 80)-net over F64, using
- digital (33, 64, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 32, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 32, 258)-net over F256, using
- (9, 24, 80)-net in base 16, using
(88−31, 88, 3172)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (57, 88, 3172)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1688, 3172, F16, 31) (dual of [3172, 3084, 32]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1688, 4096, F16, 31) (dual of [4096, 4008, 32]-code), using
- an extension Ce(30) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 163−1, defining interval I = [1,30], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 31 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1688, 4096, F16, 31) (dual of [4096, 4008, 32]-code), using
(88−31, 88, 4126391)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (57, 88, 4126392)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (57, 87, 4126392)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 573 375519 481267 599434 082825 951532 907628 718135 844574 373608 219519 087534 740772 686918 384307 883100 295383 607826 > 1687 [i]