Best Known (9, 9+31, s)-Nets in Base 16
(9, 9+31, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (9, 40, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 40, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(9, 9+31, 72)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (9, 40, 72)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 71)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 72, using
(9, 9+31, 570)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (9, 40, 571)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (9, 39, 571)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 92198 204706 102670 187688 018302 329804 825019 208976 > 1639 [i]