Best Known (91, 91+32, s)-Nets in Base 16
(91, 91+32, 4096)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (91, 123, 4096)-net over F16, using
- 162 times duplication [i] based on digital (89, 121, 4096)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (88, 121, 4096)-net over F16, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(16121, 4096, F16, 33, 33) (dual of [(4096, 33), 135047, 34]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 16-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(16121, 65537, F16, 33) (dual of [65537, 65416, 34]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65537 | 168−1, defining interval I = [0,16], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−16,−15,…,16}|+1 = 34 (BCH-bound) [i]
- OOA 16-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(16121, 65537, F16, 33) (dual of [65537, 65416, 34]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(16121, 4096, F16, 33, 33) (dual of [(4096, 33), 135047, 34]-NRT-code), using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (88, 121, 4096)-net over F16, using
(91, 91+32, 63291)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (91, 123, 63291)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(16123, 63291, F16, 32) (dual of [63291, 63168, 33]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(16123, 65550, F16, 32) (dual of [65550, 65427, 33]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(16124, 65551, F16, 33) (dual of [65551, 65427, 34]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(32) ⊂ Ce(28) [i] based on
- linear OA(16121, 65536, F16, 33) (dual of [65536, 65415, 34]-code), using an extension Ce(32) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 164−1, defining interval I = [1,32], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 33 [i]
- linear OA(16109, 65536, F16, 29) (dual of [65536, 65427, 30]-code), using an extension Ce(28) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 164−1, defining interval I = [1,28], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 29 [i]
- linear OA(163, 15, F16, 3) (dual of [15, 12, 4]-code or 15-arc in PG(2,16) or 15-cap in PG(2,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(163, 16, F16, 3) (dual of [16, 13, 4]-code or 16-arc in PG(2,16) or 16-cap in PG(2,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(13,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(163, 16, F16, 3) (dual of [16, 13, 4]-code or 16-arc in PG(2,16) or 16-cap in PG(2,16)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(32) ⊂ Ce(28) [i] based on
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(16124, 65551, F16, 33) (dual of [65551, 65427, 34]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(16123, 65550, F16, 32) (dual of [65550, 65427, 33]-code), using
(91, 91+32, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (91, 123, large)-net in base 16, because
- 30 times m-reduction [i] would yield (91, 93, large)-net in base 16, but