Best Known (78−34, 78, s)-Nets in Base 16
(78−34, 78, 524)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (44, 78, 524)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 39, 262)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 261)-sequence over F256, using
(78−34, 78, 658)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (44, 78, 658)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1678, 658, F16, 34) (dual of [658, 580, 35]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1678, 671, F16, 34) (dual of [671, 593, 35]-code), using
- 23 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (4, 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 14 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1672, 642, F16, 34) (dual of [642, 570, 35]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25636, 321, F256, 34) (dual of [321, 285, 35]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,286P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25636, 321, F256, 34) (dual of [321, 285, 35]-code), using
- 23 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (4, 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 14 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1672, 642, F16, 34) (dual of [642, 570, 35]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1678, 671, F16, 34) (dual of [671, 593, 35]-code), using
(78−34, 78, 160182)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (44, 78, 160183)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 8344 167793 147715 453510 195093 937022 166444 112542 964356 368984 547860 652439 438869 230710 483674 640766 > 1678 [i]