MinT - Best Known (82, 82+34, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (82, 82+34, s)-Nets in Base 16

(82, 82+34, 1066)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (82, 116, 1066)-net over F₁₆, using

generalized (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (3, 14, 38)-net over F₁₆, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F₁₆, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]
2. digital (17, 34, 514)-net over F₁₆, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 17, 257)-net over F₂₅₆, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F₂₅₆, using
      - generalized Faure sequence [i]
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₅₆ with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
        the rational function field F₂₅₆(x) [i]
      - Niederreiter sequence [i]
3. digital (34, 68, 514)-net over F₁₆, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 34, 257)-net over F₂₅₆, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F₂₅₆ (see above)

(82, 82+34, 15011)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (82, 116, 15011)-net over F₁₆, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(82, 82+34, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (82, 116, large)-net in base 16, because

32 times m-reduction [i] would yield (82, 84, large)-net in base 16, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]