Best Known (40, 40+35, s)-Nets in Base 16
(40, 40+35, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (40, 75, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (40, 76, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 38, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 38, 259)-net over F256, using
(40, 40+35, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (40, 75, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (40, 76, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 38, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 38, 321)-net over F256, using
(40, 40+35, 83419)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (40, 75, 83420)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (40, 74, 83420)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 127316 388866 983372 583731 509865 573060 998394 575050 730091 666713 833017 633523 387961 414450 274351 > 1674 [i]