MinT - Best Known (56, 56+35, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (56, 56+35, s)-Nets in Base 16

(56, 56+35, 559)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (56, 91, 559)-net over F₁₆, using

(u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (4, 21, 45)-net over F₁₆, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 44)-sequence over F₁₆, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
      - a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]
2. digital (35, 70, 514)-net over F₁₆, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 35, 257)-net over F₂₅₆, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F₂₅₆, using
      - generalized Faure sequence [i]
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₅₆ with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
        the rational function field F₂₅₆(x) [i]
      - Niederreiter sequence [i]

(56, 56+35, 1524)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (56, 91, 1524)-net over F₁₆, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(56, 56+35, 1133974)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (56, 91, 1133975)-net in base 16, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (56, 90, 1133975)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16^mÂ â‰¥ 2 348559 211863 899907 578029 984270 025382 902600 288423 397673 196937 220112 835997 443137 161093 810762 231993 809440 918626 > 16⁹⁰ [i]