Best Known (83, 83+36, s)-Nets in Base 16
(83, 83+36, 1038)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (83, 119, 1038)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (83, 120, 1038)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (22, 40, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 20, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 20, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (43, 80, 520)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 40, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 40, 260)-net over F256, using
- digital (22, 40, 518)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(83, 83+36, 11530)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (83, 119, 11530)-net over F16, using
(83, 83+36, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (83, 119, large)-net in base 16, because
- 34 times m-reduction [i] would yield (83, 85, large)-net in base 16, but