Best Known (81−37, 81, s)-Nets in Base 16
(81−37, 81, 520)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (44, 81, 520)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (44, 82, 520)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 41, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 41, 260)-net over F256, using
(81−37, 81, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (44, 81, 642)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (44, 84, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 42, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 42, 321)-net over F256, using
(81−37, 81, 113147)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (44, 81, 113148)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (44, 80, 113148)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 136070 765080 053795 804866 784169 252832 483965 063669 968084 060000 907897 275289 203686 739849 173604 345011 > 1680 [i]