Best Known (87−37, 87, s)-Nets in Base 16
(87−37, 87, 526)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 87, 526)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (50, 88, 526)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 44, 263)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 262)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 44, 263)-net over F256, using
(87−37, 87, 793)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (50, 87, 793)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1687, 793, F16, 37) (dual of [793, 706, 38]-code), using
- 142 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (4, 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 26 times 0, 1, 40 times 0, 1, 52 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1678, 642, F16, 37) (dual of [642, 564, 38]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25639, 321, F256, 37) (dual of [321, 282, 38]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,283P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25639, 321, F256, 37) (dual of [321, 282, 38]-code), using
- 142 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (4, 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 26 times 0, 1, 40 times 0, 1, 52 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1678, 642, F16, 37) (dual of [642, 564, 38]-code), using
(87−37, 87, 285129)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 87, 285130)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (50, 86, 285130)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 35 837691 820160 086073 865045 593452 312590 001540 006705 524351 657537 761131 346303 816880 014767 676899 300637 328976 > 1686 [i]