Best Known (42, 42+37, s)-Nets in Base 16
(42, 42+37, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (42, 79, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (42, 80, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 40, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 40, 259)-net over F256, using
(42, 42+37, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (42, 79, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (42, 80, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 40, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 40, 321)-net over F256, using
(42, 42+37, 83146)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (42, 79, 83147)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (42, 78, 83147)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 8345 494026 135084 939029 148419 450280 843181 238987 613379 538747 156295 523272 287496 970604 446877 192716 > 1678 [i]