MinT - Best Known (90, 90+38, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (90, 90+38, s)-Nets in Base 16

(90, 90+38, 1061)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (90, 128, 1061)-net over F₁₆, using

generalized (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (2, 14, 33)-net over F₁₆, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 32)-sequence over F₁₆, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]
2. digital (19, 38, 514)-net over F₁₆, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 19, 257)-net over F₂₅₆, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F₂₅₆, using
      - generalized Faure sequence [i]
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₅₆ with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
        the rational function field F₂₅₆(x) [i]
      - Niederreiter sequence [i]
3. digital (38, 76, 514)-net over F₁₆, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 38, 257)-net over F₂₅₆, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F₂₅₆ (see above)

(90, 90+38, 14321)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (90, 128, 14321)-net over F₁₆, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(90, 90+38, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (90, 128, large)-net in base 16, because

36 times m-reduction [i] would yield (90, 92, large)-net in base 16, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]