Best Known (85, 85+39, s)-Nets in Base 16
(85, 85+39, 1036)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (85, 124, 1036)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (23, 42, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 21, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 21, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (43, 82, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 41, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 41, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (23, 42, 518)-net over F16, using
(85, 85+39, 8529)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (85, 124, 8529)-net over F16, using
(85, 85+39, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (85, 124, large)-net in base 16, because
- 37 times m-reduction [i] would yield (85, 87, large)-net in base 16, but