Best Known (86, 86+39, s)-Nets in Base 16
(86, 86+39, 1036)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 125, 1036)-net over F16, using
- 161 times duplication [i] based on digital (85, 124, 1036)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (23, 42, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 21, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 21, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (43, 82, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 41, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 41, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (23, 42, 518)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(86, 86+39, 9173)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (86, 125, 9173)-net over F16, using
(86, 86+39, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 125, large)-net in base 16, because
- 37 times m-reduction [i] would yield (86, 88, large)-net in base 16, but