Best Known (129−40, 129, s)-Nets in Base 16
(129−40, 129, 1036)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 129, 1036)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (89, 130, 1036)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (24, 44, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 22, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 22, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (45, 86, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 43, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 43, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (24, 44, 518)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(129−40, 129, 9887)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (89, 129, 9887)-net over F16, using
(129−40, 129, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 129, large)-net in base 16, because
- 38 times m-reduction [i] would yield (89, 91, large)-net in base 16, but