Best Known (85−40, 85, s)-Nets in Base 16
(85−40, 85, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (45, 85, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (45, 86, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 43, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 43, 259)-net over F256, using
(85−40, 85, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (45, 85, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (45, 86, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 43, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 43, 321)-net over F256, using
(85−40, 85, 72553)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (45, 85, 72554)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 239878 993499 924552 099055 807650 825100 372917 089294 021229 493636 380626 422685 947037 131888 546707 554698 628076 > 1685 [i]