Best Known (87−40, 87, s)-Nets in Base 16
(87−40, 87, 520)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (47, 87, 520)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (47, 88, 520)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 44, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 44, 260)-net over F256, using
(87−40, 87, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (47, 87, 642)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (47, 90, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 45, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 45, 321)-net over F256, using
(87−40, 87, 95738)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (47, 87, 95739)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 573 404463 739084 866471 670450 441829 037630 231120 202326 083199 674787 563466 715612 051046 968039 455497 981516 394826 > 1687 [i]