Best Known (129−41, 129, s)-Nets in Base 16
(129−41, 129, 1034)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (88, 129, 1034)-net over F16, using
- 161 times duplication [i] based on digital (87, 128, 1034)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (22, 42, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 21, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 21, 258)-net over F256, using
- digital (45, 86, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 43, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 43, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (22, 42, 516)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(129−41, 129, 8055)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (88, 129, 8055)-net over F16, using
(129−41, 129, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (88, 129, large)-net in base 16, because
- 39 times m-reduction [i] would yield (88, 90, large)-net in base 16, but