Best Known (89−42, 89, s)-Nets in Base 16
(89−42, 89, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (47, 89, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (47, 90, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 45, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 45, 259)-net over F256, using
(89−42, 89, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (47, 89, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (47, 90, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 45, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 45, 321)-net over F256, using
(89−42, 89, 73368)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (47, 89, 73369)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 146809 460503 858666 611073 367078 332975 499368 937505 922668 100627 613604 830694 898598 984316 411390 006844 084473 663736 > 1689 [i]