Best Known (89−43, 89, s)-Nets in Base 16
(89−43, 89, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 89, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (46, 90, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 45, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 45, 258)-net over F256, using
(89−43, 89, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (46, 89, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (46, 90, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 45, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 45, 289)-net over F256, using
(89−43, 89, 64292)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 89, 64293)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 88, 64293)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 9175 441116 977630 696844 434696 753742 142508 066998 898260 190528 220388 090439 701186 020974 208676 373229 059317 463296 > 1688 [i]