Best Known (69, 69+43, s)-Nets in Base 16
(69, 69+43, 563)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (69, 112, 563)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 26, 49)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 48)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 49, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 48)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (43, 86, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 43, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 43, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (5, 26, 49)-net over F16, using
(69, 69+43, 1810)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (69, 112, 1810)-net over F16, using
(69, 69+43, 1339774)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (69, 112, 1339775)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (69, 111, 1339775)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 45 427558 214537 868077 605053 095699 190636 698630 233853 893141 171023 157938 409850 735471 851928 086427 881895 353753 393006 015225 864478 237705 479126 > 16111 [i]