Best Known (98−44, 98, s)-Nets in Base 16
(98−44, 98, 524)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 98, 524)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 49, 262)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 261)-sequence over F256, using
(98−44, 98, 646)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (54, 98, 646)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(1698, 646, F16, 2, 44) (dual of [(646, 2), 1194, 45]-NRT-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OOA(25649, 323, F256, 2, 44) (dual of [(323, 2), 597, 45]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(2;F,595P) ⊂ AG(2;F,599P) [i] based on
- linear OOA(25646, 320, F256, 2, 44) (dual of [(320, 2), 594, 45]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,595P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- linear OOA(25642, 320, F256, 2, 40) (dual of [(320, 2), 598, 41]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(2;F,599P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321 (see above)
- linear OOA(2563, 3, F256, 2, 3) (dual of [(3, 2), 3, 4]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(2563, 256, F256, 2, 3) (dual of [(256, 2), 509, 4]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;509,256) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(2563, 256, F256, 2, 3) (dual of [(256, 2), 509, 4]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(2;F,595P) ⊂ AG(2;F,599P) [i] based on
- trace code [i] based on linear OOA(25649, 323, F256, 2, 44) (dual of [(323, 2), 597, 45]-NRT-code), using
(98−44, 98, 139486)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 98, 139487)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 10087 949095 248640 486315 670540 548163 109984 878607 802240 085349 245503 167105 935309 738779 064801 977440 628369 352446 426898 399761 > 1698 [i]