Best Known (97−45, 97, s)-Nets in Base 16
(97−45, 97, 520)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (52, 97, 520)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (52, 98, 520)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 49, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 49, 260)-net over F256, using
(97−45, 97, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (52, 97, 642)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (52, 100, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 50, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 50, 321)-net over F256, using
(97−45, 97, 108406)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (52, 97, 108407)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (52, 96, 108407)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 39 405503 338398 232972 870995 695386 309838 877091 598001 555233 723899 034198 166091 639927 685530 876521 562106 943194 429817 194611 > 1696 [i]