Best Known (53, 53+45, s)-Nets in Base 16
(53, 53+45, 522)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (53, 98, 522)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 49, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
(53, 53+45, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (53, 98, 642)-net over F16, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (53, 102, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 51, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 51, 321)-net over F256, using
(53, 53+45, 122968)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (53, 98, 122969)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (53, 97, 122969)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 630 485258 358571 352248 533177 121936 505727 605398 248269 086725 579967 495647 968475 352788 687412 364401 837016 496209 097768 079396 > 1697 [i]