Best Known (54, 54+45, s)-Nets in Base 16
(54, 54+45, 522)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 99, 522)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (54, 100, 522)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 50, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 50, 261)-net over F256, using
(54, 54+45, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (54, 99, 642)-net over F16, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (54, 104, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 52, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 52, 321)-net over F256, using
(54, 54+45, 139486)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 99, 139487)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (54, 98, 139487)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 10087 949095 248640 486315 670540 548163 109984 878607 802240 085349 245503 167105 935309 738779 064801 977440 628369 352446 426898 399761 > 1698 [i]