Best Known (62, 62+45, s)-Nets in Base 16
(62, 62+45, 530)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (62, 107, 530)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (62, 108, 530)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 54, 265)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 264)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 54, 265)-net over F256, using
(62, 62+45, 1026)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (62, 107, 1026)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (62, 108, 1026)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 54, 513)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 512)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- K1,1 from the tower of function fields by Niederreiter and Xing based on the tower by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F256 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 512)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 54, 513)-net over F256, using
(62, 62+45, 382311)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (62, 107, 382312)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (62, 106, 382312)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 43 324605 743601 189725 214201 905748 568688 985080 211491 736464 949268 347832 730771 703379 834011 112998 760542 270113 512372 231038 446046 828886 > 16106 [i]