Best Known (55, 55+47, s)-Nets in Base 16
(55, 55+47, 522)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (55, 102, 522)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 51, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
(55, 55+47, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (55, 102, 642)-net over F16, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (55, 106, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 53, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 53, 321)-net over F256, using
(55, 55+47, 121892)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (55, 102, 121893)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (55, 101, 121893)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 41 318365 802178 835847 002564 098971 411723 601518 708464 694056 437210 165601 039358 912575 187626 917529 459158 010687 517584 342960 719136 > 16101 [i]