Best Known (76, 76+47, s)-Nets in Base 16
(76, 76+47, 579)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (76, 123, 579)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 29, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (47, 94, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 47, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 47, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (6, 29, 65)-net over F16, using
(76, 76+47, 2013)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (76, 123, 2013)-net over F16, using
(76, 76+47, 1532613)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (76, 123, 1532614)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (76, 122, 1532614)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 799 172163 257239 402385 069170 326463 015445 431643 046213 609398 688004 793578 922581 357378 434357 310927 913157 641801 679910 127954 967906 611123 161656 444951 391456 > 16122 [i]