Best Known (55, 55+48, s)-Nets in Base 16
(55, 55+48, 520)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (55, 103, 520)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (55, 104, 520)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 52, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 52, 260)-net over F256, using
(55, 55+48, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (55, 103, 642)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (55, 106, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 53, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 53, 321)-net over F256, using
(55, 55+48, 96137)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (55, 103, 96138)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 10577 588503 769628 796910 164580 959692 255703 627459 686382 732657 006635 182852 186753 238826 365335 761425 634362 283350 714438 198253 337656 > 16103 [i]