Best Known (103−49, 103, s)-Nets in Base 16
(103−49, 103, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 103, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (54, 104, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 52, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 52, 259)-net over F256, using
(103−49, 103, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (54, 103, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (54, 104, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 52, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 52, 321)-net over F256, using
(103−49, 103, 85647)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 103, 85648)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (54, 102, 85648)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 661 137838 112332 866414 939544 601948 053995 371672 453471 135248 584282 294917 082909 734366 802554 499721 193976 761644 114678 590209 007256 > 16102 [i]