Best Known (106−49, 106, s)-Nets in Base 16
(106−49, 106, 522)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (57, 106, 522)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 53, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
(106−49, 106, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (57, 106, 642)-net over F16, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (57, 110, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 55, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 55, 321)-net over F256, using
(106−49, 106, 121129)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (57, 106, 121130)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (57, 105, 121130)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 708026 471302 345953 789737 450141 025627 368965 280075 292058 238046 689525 755045 006210 053056 079772 397327 448587 790312 692709 921903 401426 > 16105 [i]