Best Known (107−50, 107, s)-Nets in Base 16
(107−50, 107, 520)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (57, 107, 520)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (57, 108, 520)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 54, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 54, 260)-net over F256, using
(107−50, 107, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (57, 107, 642)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (57, 110, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 55, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 55, 321)-net over F256, using
(107−50, 107, 96628)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (57, 107, 96629)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 693 199700 512636 175898 863460 900071 852688 756649 411687 176618 424317 032970 109034 579539 616590 564544 624511 878163 760361 040293 276940 723376 > 16107 [i]