Best Known (107−51, 107, s)-Nets in Base 16
(107−51, 107, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (56, 107, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (56, 108, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 54, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 54, 259)-net over F256, using
(107−51, 107, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (56, 107, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (56, 108, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 54, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 54, 321)-net over F256, using
(107−51, 107, 86483)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (56, 107, 86484)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (56, 106, 86484)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 43 325694 664651 127233 484298 340131 544977 428659 006327 398097 080781 634571 667823 455937 998029 326308 711991 395629 545036 770456 734276 828376 > 16106 [i]