Best Known (32, 32+51, s)-Nets in Base 16
(32, 32+51, 89)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 83, 89)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 26, 24)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (6, 57, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (1, 26, 24)-net over F16, using
(32, 32+51, 120)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(32, 83, 120)-net in base 16, using
- 22 times m-reduction [i] based on (32, 105, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 84, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 84, 120)-net over F32, using
(32, 32+51, 168)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (32, 83, 168)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (31, 83, 168)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 167)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 168, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 167)-sequence over F16, using
(32, 32+51, 6026)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 83, 6027)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (32, 82, 6027)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 547 953249 199765 884788 489217 786100 146753 523282 210206 878394 800973 961851 031045 328571 540728 257932 231376 > 1682 [i]