Best Known (55, 55+52, s)-Nets in Base 16
(55, 55+52, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (55, 107, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (55, 108, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 54, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 54, 258)-net over F256, using
(55, 55+52, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (55, 107, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (55, 108, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 54, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 54, 289)-net over F256, using
(55, 55+52, 63463)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (55, 107, 63464)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 693 424498 030578 190419 485827 681116 895473 510814 317401 137371 347919 217461 912475 445570 355759 359052 613945 357840 730735 941768 234183 397836 > 16107 [i]