Best Known (57, 57+52, s)-Nets in Base 16
(57, 57+52, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (57, 109, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (57, 110, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 55, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 55, 259)-net over F256, using
(57, 57+52, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (57, 109, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (57, 110, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 55, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 55, 321)-net over F256, using
(57, 57+52, 78553)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (57, 109, 78554)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 177490 575687 322161 060420 263417 138222 958331 185190 619705 801521 894762 009748 432939 159876 120749 722146 663983 444337 640441 002650 838265 007936 > 16109 [i]