MinT - Best Known (74−53, 74, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (74−53, 74, s)-Nets in Base 16

(74−53, 74, 65)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (21, 74, 65)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 74, 65)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
    - the Hermitian function field over F₁₆ [i]

(74−53, 74, 76)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive

(21, 74, 76)-net in base 16, using

6 times m-reduction [i] based on (21, 80, 76)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 64, 76)-net over F₃₂, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F₃₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(74−53, 74, 129)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (21, 74, 129)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 74, 129)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
    - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(74−53, 74, 1676)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (21, 74, 1677)-net in base 16, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (21, 73, 1677)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16^mÂ â‰¥ 8050 886330 685536 459107 416290 165188 276233 697605 479957 354915 062715 978401 560214 940762 504656 > 16⁷³ [i]