Best Known (89−55, 89, s)-Nets in Base 16
(89−55, 89, 89)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 89, 89)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 28, 24)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (6, 61, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (1, 28, 24)-net over F16, using
(89−55, 89, 120)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(34, 89, 120)-net in base 16, using
- 26 times m-reduction [i] based on (34, 115, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 92, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 92, 120)-net over F32, using
(89−55, 89, 193)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (34, 89, 193)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 89, 193)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 192)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 193, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 192)-sequence over F16, using
(89−55, 89, 6106)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 89, 6107)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (34, 88, 6107)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 9187 569023 691511 226304 634865 995409 956782 554854 238305 901093 198532 766552 563135 949713 483205 641474 432439 497136 > 1688 [i]