Best Known (61, 61+55, s)-Nets in Base 16
(61, 61+55, 520)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (61, 116, 520)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 58, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
(61, 61+55, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (61, 116, 642)-net over F16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (61, 118, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 59, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 59, 321)-net over F256, using
(61, 61+55, 97928)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (61, 116, 97929)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (61, 115, 97929)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 977548 037757 546605 561284 445861 676221 664117 898699 893955 143706 536960 654844 938286 768946 608269 260703 277224 790883 995531 861612 341784 626769 498496 > 16115 [i]