Best Known (117−56, 117, s)-Nets in Base 16
(117−56, 117, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (61, 117, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (61, 118, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 59, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 59, 259)-net over F256, using
(117−56, 117, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (61, 117, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (61, 118, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 59, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 59, 321)-net over F256, using
(117−56, 117, 80971)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (61, 117, 80972)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 762 251177 041066 171601 816588 642173 027466 883420 659387 551365 617623 116022 827451 354328 611796 739708 929884 329722 089883 597309 875305 304037 328246 360016 > 16117 [i]