Best Known (128−56, 128, s)-Nets in Base 16
(128−56, 128, 530)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (72, 128, 530)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 64, 265)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 264)-sequence over F256, using
(128−56, 128, 1026)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (72, 128, 1026)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 64, 513)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 512)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- K1,1 from the tower of function fields by Niederreiter and Xing based on the tower by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F256 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 512)-sequence over F256, using
(128−56, 128, 240676)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (72, 128, 240677)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 13407 854912 130371 379464 622191 718157 602368 014359 242443 998197 514819 688027 367579 530306 950974 865930 130003 302811 570297 389129 942954 688247 090793 605068 982086 256116 > 16128 [i]