Best Known (92−57, 92, s)-Nets in Base 16
(92−57, 92, 89)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 92, 89)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 29, 24)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (6, 63, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (1, 29, 24)-net over F16, using
(92−57, 92, 120)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(35, 92, 120)-net in base 16, using
- 28 times m-reduction [i] based on (35, 120, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 96, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 96, 120)-net over F32, using
(92−57, 92, 193)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (35, 92, 193)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 92, 193)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 192)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 193, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 192)-sequence over F16, using
(92−57, 92, 6154)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 92, 6155)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 91, 6155)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 37 592625 827612 888513 103890 100634 120526 996321 629760 984184 989618 453118 641406 015818 773177 230181 154098 934315 838976 > 1691 [i]