Best Known (60, 60+57, s)-Nets in Base 16
(60, 60+57, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (60, 117, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (60, 118, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 59, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 59, 258)-net over F256, using
(60, 60+57, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (60, 117, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (60, 118, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 59, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 59, 289)-net over F256, using
(60, 60+57, 73336)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (60, 117, 73337)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (60, 116, 73337)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 47 644190 733557 564503 699558 992598 050523 019588 626986 511767 911860 070077 514920 778013 401092 111322 279712 080455 493466 171244 727622 175289 866737 535816 > 16116 [i]